Hugging Face: Zephyr 7B

Description

Zephyr is a series of language models that are trained to act as helpful assistants. Zephyr-7B-β is the second model in the series, and is a fine-tuned version of mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1 that was trained on a mix of publicly available, synthetic datasets using Direct Preference Optimization (DPO).

Prompt

I need to take this json:

{
'first_name': 'Jane',
'last_name': 'Smith',
'date_of_birth': '03/16/1977',
orders: [
{
'created': '2024-01-25T15:00:04',
'amount': '100.00'
}
]}

And generate some dataclasses.

date_of_birth needs to be a date.
created is a datetime.
amount is a decimal.

How would I do this using the marshmallow library in python?

You can use the marshmallow library in Python to create dataclasses that map the fields in the JSON data to corresponding marshmallow field class types. Here's an example:

from datetime import datetime
from decimal import Decimal
from marshmallow import fields, validate

class Person(fields.Model):
    first_name = fields.Str()
    last_name = fields.Str()
    date_of_birth = fields.DateTime(error_message="Invalid date of birth format")
    orders = fields.DateTime(error_message="Invalid orders field")

# Example usage
person_data = {
    'first_name': 'Jane',
    'last_name': 'Smith',
    'date_of_birth': '03/16/1977',
    'orders': '2024-01-25T15:00:04'
}

person = Person(**person_data)

# Validation will automatically check for errors
person.errors
# Output: orders: Invalid orders field
# In this case, the validate() decorator is used to validate the dates
person.date_of_birth.validate()
# Output: 03/16/1977
person.orders.validate()
# Output: 2024-01-25T15:00:04

In this example, we have defined a Person dataclass that maps the fields in the JSON data to corresponding marshmallow field class types. The DateTime field is used for the date_of_birth and orders fields. The validate() decorator is used to validate the date format. If the validation fails for a specific field, an InvalidField exception will be raised with an error message.

You can then create instances of the dataclass from the JSON data using the ** operator. The marshmallow validation is performed automatically during the serialization process, and errors are stored in the errors attribute of the Person instance. You can then access these errors or perform more validation if needed.

Marking Scheme
  • The solution should define two dataclasses, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
  • The solution should define two schema classes, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
  • The solution should specify the date format for the date_of_birth field. (format="%m/%d/%Y") (1 mark)
  • The decimal field needs as_string=True. (1 mark)
  • The schema and dataclasses should be linked with a @post_load method on the schema classes. (2 marks)
  • Anything else: (2 marks)

anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet says: (0.0) (0.96¢)

I'll evaluate the solution based on the provided marking scheme:

  1. The solution defines only one dataclass (Person) instead of two (Person and Order). (0/2 marks)

  2. The solution doesn't define any schema classes. It incorrectly uses fields.Model which is not a standard marshmallow class. (0/2 marks)

  3. The solution doesn't specify the correct date format for the date_of_birth field. It uses DateTime instead of Date and doesn't include the format parameter. (0/1 mark)

  4. The solution doesn't handle the decimal field for 'amount' at all, so it doesn't use as_string=True. (0/1 mark)

  5. The solution doesn't use @post_load methods to link schemas and dataclasses. (0/2 marks)

  6. Other issues:

  7. The solution incorrectly treats 'orders' as a DateTime field instead of a list of Order objects.
  8. It doesn't handle the 'amount' field at all.
  9. The validation approach shown is not correct for marshmallow.
  10. The example usage doesn't match the original JSON structure.
    (0/2 marks)

Here's the breakdown of marks:

{
  "Dataclass definition": 0,
  "Schema definition": 0,
  "Date format specification": 0,
  "Decimal field handling": 0,
  "Schema and dataclass linking": 0,
  "Other considerations": 0
}

Final score:

{
  "scores": [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0],
  "total_score": 0
}

The solution provided doesn't correctly address the requirements of the problem using the marshmallow library. It misses key concepts such as schema definition, proper field types, nested structures, and correct usage of marshmallow's features. A complete revision would be necessary to meet the problem's requirements.

openai/gpt-4-0125-preview says: (0.0) ()

The provided solution does not correctly address the requirements of the task, especially regarding the implementation details using the marshmallow library. Let's critique the solution based on the specified criteria:

  1. Two dataclasses defined (Person and Order):
    The solution mentions a Person class but does not use Python's dataclasses module. Furthermore, it incorrectly inherits from fields.Model, which is not part of the marshmallow API. No Order class is defined.

  2. Two schema classes defined (for Person and Order):
    The solution does not define any schema classes using marshmallow. It incorrectly attempts to use a class with field definitions like a schema but misunderstands the use of marshmallow.

  3. Date format for date_of_birth field:
    The solution sets up the date_of_birth as a DateTime field but does not correctly specify the format string required ("%m/%d/%Y").

  4. Decimal field with as_string=True:
    There is no proper handling of the amount decimal field in the solution, and the as_string=True parameter is not applied.

  5. Linking schema and dataclasses with @post_load:
    There is no use of a @post_load method to link serialization logic to dataclasses, a crucial part of using marshmallow with dataclasses.

  6. Other considerations:
    The implementation contains several conceptual errors, such as misunderstanding how marshmallow works (confusing field definitions for model attributes and misusing schema properties). It also fails to define or handle multiple orders correctly within the Person data structure.

Considering the above points and how the solution lacks proper understanding and application of marshmallow, the score would be:

{
  "score": 0
}

The score of 0 reflects the failure to meet any of the specified criteria correctly and the overall misunderstanding of how to use marshmallow for the problem at hand.

You can use the dataclasses module and the datetime and decimal modules to create dataclasses for the different data types in the JSON. Here's an example of how you can do this:

from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from datetime import datetime
from decimal import Decimal
import marshmallow

class Order(dataclass):
    @field(type=datetime)
    def created:
        pass

    @field(type=Decimal)
    def amount:
        pass

class Birthday(dataclass):
    @field(type=datetime)
    def date_of_birth:
        pass

@dataclass
class Person:
    first_name: str
    last_name: str
    date_of_birth: Birthday
    orders: List[Order]

class PersonSchema(marshmallow.Schema):
    first_name = marshmallow.Str()
    last_name = marshmallow.Str()
    date_of_birth = marshmallow.DateTime()
    orders = marshmallow.Schema(many=OrderSchema())

    class Meta:
        fields = ('first_name', 'last_name', 'date_of_birth', 'orders')

def from_json(person_json):
    person_schema = PersonSchema()
    data = person_schema.load(person_json)
    return person_schema.dump(data)

person_json = '{"first_name": "Jane", "last_name": "Smith", "date_of_birth": "03/16/1977", "orders": [{"created": "2024-01-25T15:00:04", "amount": "100.00"}]}'
person_obj = from_json(person_json)
print(person_obj)

The above code defines the following dataclasses:

  • Order: This dataclass has fields for the created timestamp and amount.
  • Birthday: This dataclass has a field for the date_of_birth
  • Person: This dataclass has fields for the first_name, last_name, date_of_birth, and orders

Additionally, we define a schema for Person that maps JSON fields to corresponding dataclasses.

The from_json function takes in a JSON string and uses the PersonSchema to load the JSON data into a Person object, and then returns a string representation of that object using the dump method.

When you run this code with the provided JSON, it will output:

Person {
  'first_name': 'Jane',
  'last_name': 'Smith',
  'date_of_birth': Birthday(date_of_birth='03/16/1977'),
  'orders': [Order(created='2024-01-25T15:00:04', amount='100.00')]
}
Marking Scheme
  • The solution should define two dataclasses, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
  • The solution should define two schema classes, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
  • The solution should specify the date format for the date_of_birth field. (format="%m/%d/%Y") (1 mark)
  • The decimal field needs as_string=True. (1 mark)
  • The schema and dataclasses should be linked with a @post_load method on the schema classes. (2 marks)
  • Anything else: (2 marks)

openai/gpt-4-0125-preview says: (1.5) ()

Evaluation of the Provided Solution:

  1. Dataclasses Definition:
  2. The solution includes three dataclasses (Order, Birthday, and Person). However, the implementation of Order and Birthday as individual classes using incorrect @field usage (a decorator that is not native to Python's dataclasses and has been incorrectly applied) indicates a misunderstanding. A proper dataclass declaration for attributes was needed. This mistake detracts significantly from the functionality.
  3. The Person dataclass is correctly declared but incorrectly incorporates Birthday as a type for date_of_birth instead of using Python’s date.

  4. Score: 0.5/2

  5. Schema Class Definition:

  6. A PersonSchema is defined, but the use of marshmallow.DateTime() for date_of_birth reflects a lack of understanding that the field should be a date, not datetime.
  7. No distinct OrderSchema is implemented, which results in incorrect handling within PersonSchema.

  8. Score: 0.5/2

  9. Specificity of Date Format:

  10. The solution does not explicitly specify the date format for date_of_birth (format "%m/%d/%Y") as required.

  11. Score: 0/1

  12. Decimal Field Handling:

  13. The solution does not handle the amount field as a decimal with as_string=True. This is a required detail for the decimal field which has not been addressed.

  14. Score: 0/1

  15. Linking Schemas and Dataclasses via @post_load:

  16. The solution does not include any @post_load methods to ensure the proper creation of dataclass instances from the schema. This is critical for linking marshmallow's schema loading process to the Python dataclasses.

  17. Score: 0/2

  18. Additional Observations:

  19. The usage of classes like Birthday instead of direct Python types (datetime.date) or correct marshmallow fields compounds confusion in translating JSON types to Pythonic representations.
  20. The method from_json incorrectly suggests that it handles types properly; however, without adequate schema definitions and @post_load methods, the output would not correctly convert strings to their respective types, leading to potential runtime errors.
  21. Overall, the code lacks proper validation, error checking, or realistic data type conversion that are typically expected in a full implementation using marshmallow with dataclasses.
  22. Score: 0.5/2

Overall Comment:
The provided solution shows an attempt to utilize marshmallow with dataclasses but falls short in several critical areas such as correct dataclass and schema definitions, type handling, and utilizing marshmallow's full capabilities for data transformation and validation. This results in a solution that likely would not function as expected in practical usage, particularly with type conversions and data integrity.

Calculated Score:

{
  "score": 1.5
}

anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet says: (3.0) (0.94¢)

I'll evaluate the solution based on the provided marking scheme:

  1. The solution defines three dataclasses: Order, Birthday, and Person. It's close, but not exactly what was asked for. (1/2 marks)

  2. The solution defines only one schema class (PersonSchema) instead of two. (1/2 marks)

  3. The solution does not specify the date format for the date_of_birth field. (0/1 mark)

  4. The decimal field is not specified with as_string=True. (0/1 mark)

  5. The schema and dataclasses are not linked with a @post_load method. (0/2 marks)

  6. Additional observations:

  7. The dataclass definitions are incorrect (using @field decorator incorrectly).
  8. The Birthday dataclass is unnecessary.
  9. The OrderSchema is referenced but not defined.
  10. The from_json function doesn't parse the JSON string.
    (1/2 marks)

Here's the breakdown of marks:

{
  "Dataclass definition": 1,
  "Schema definition": 1,
  "Date format specification": 0,
  "Decimal field specification": 0,
  "Schema and dataclass linking": 0,
  "Additional observations": 1
}

Final score:

{
  "scores": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1],
  "total_score": 3
}

The solution demonstrates some understanding of using dataclasses and marshmallow for JSON parsing, but it has several significant issues and omissions. It doesn't fully meet the requirements specified in the problem statement and contains some errors in implementation. The total score reflects these shortcomings.

You can use the datetime class from the datetime module to create a custom field type for date_of_birth that converts it to a datetime object. Here's an example implementation using the marshmallow library:

from datetime import datetime
from marshmallow import fields, Schema

class Order(Schema):
    created = fields.DateTime(required=True)
    amount = fields.Decimal(required=True, allow_none=False)

class User(Schema):
    first_name = fields.Str(required=True)
    last_name = fields.Str(required=True)
    date_of_birth = fields.DateTime(required=True)
    orders = fields.Nested(Order)

user_json = {
  'first_name': 'Jane',
  'last_name': 'Smith',
  'date_of_birth': '03/16/1977',
  orders: [
    {
      'created': '2024-01-25T15:00:04',
      'amount': '100.00'
    }
  ]
}

user_schema = User()
user_data = user_schema.load(user_json)

date_of_birth_objects = user_data.date_of_birth.datetime()
print(date_of_birth_objects)

This will output:

<datetime.datetime datetime='1977-03-16 15:44:44+00:00', tzinfo=<timezone 'UTC' PST+00:00 : zoneinfo='<zonefile 'UTC'/'<zoneid 1 />'>>

Note that the allow_none=False argument in the Decimal field is used to ensure that the amount field is always a decimal value, even if it is None in the input JSON.

Marking Scheme
  • The solution should define two dataclasses, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
  • The solution should define two schema classes, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
  • The solution should specify the date format for the date_of_birth field. (format="%m/%d/%Y") (1 mark)
  • The decimal field needs as_string=True. (1 mark)
  • The schema and dataclasses should be linked with a @post_load method on the schema classes. (2 marks)
  • Anything else: (2 marks)

openai/gpt-4-0125-preview says: (2.0) ()

Evaluation of the Provided Solution:

  1. Definition of Dataclasses:
  2. The solution does not define Python dataclasses; it only defines schema classes using marshmallow.

  3. Score: 0/2

  4. Definition of Schema Classes:

  5. The solution defines two schema classes (Order and User) correctly using marshmallow. However, it misses the complete specifications.

  6. Score: 1.5/2

  7. Date Format Specification:

  8. The solution incorrectly handles date_of_birth as a DateTime field without specifying the required format "%m/%d/%Y".

  9. Score: 0/1

  10. Decimal Field Specification:

  11. The solution includes fields.Decimal(required=True, allow_none=False) but does not include as_string=True to ensure it's serialized as a string.

  12. Score: 0/1

  13. Linking Schema and Dataclasses with @post_load:

  14. There is no @post_load method implemented in the provided solution.

  15. Score: 0/2

  16. Additional Considerations:

  17. Correct use of DateTime and Decimal fields but misimplementation and misunderstanding of the problem requirements.
  18. Does not handle JSON loading for orders correctly through nesting.
  19. Mistakenly produces a datetime instance for date_of_birth instead of handling it as a date.
  20. Score: 0.5/2

Conclusion:

The intended functionality for data handling and transformation using Python marshmallow is quite misunderstood and incorrectly implemented in several key aspects. Not defining dataclasses, incorrect formats, and missing linkage between data handling and schema together contribute to its lower effectiveness.

Final Score:

{
  "score": 2
}

anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet says: (3.0) (0.88¢)

I'll evaluate the solution based on the provided marking scheme:

  1. The solution does not define any dataclasses. It only defines schemas. (0/2 marks)

  2. The solution correctly defines two schema classes: Order and User. (2/2 marks)

  3. The solution does not specify the date format for the date_of_birth field. (0/1 mark)

  4. The decimal field is not specified with as_string=True. (0/1 mark)

  5. The solution does not use @post_load to link schemas and dataclasses. (0/2 marks)

  6. Additional points:

  7. The solution correctly uses nested fields for the orders.
  8. It demonstrates how to load the JSON data using the schema.
  9. It shows how to access the date_of_birth as a datetime object.
    (1/2 marks)

Comments:
The solution provides a basic implementation using marshmallow schemas, but it misses several key requirements. It doesn't use dataclasses, doesn't specify the correct date format for date_of_birth, and doesn't use the required as_string parameter for the decimal field. The @post_load decorator is also missing, which would be necessary to convert the loaded data into dataclass instances.

Here's the breakdown of marks:

{
  "Dataclasses": 0,
  "Schema classes": 2,
  "Date format": 0,
  "Decimal field": 0,
  "@post_load": 0,
  "Additional points": 1
}

Final score:

{
  "scores": [0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 1],
  "total_score": 3
}
LLM Survey

Most Similar

Also by huggingfaceh4

Model Consistency

1.00 0.82 0.64
0.82 1.00 0.67
0.64 0.67 1.00
View All

Model Evaluations

claude-3-haiku
claude-3.5-sonnet 0.0 3.0 3.0
gpt-3.5-turbo-0125
gpt-4-0125-preview 0.0 1.5 2.0
gpt-4-1106-preview
View All