Description
An experimental fine-tune of Yi 34b 200k using bagel. This is the version of the fine-tune before direct preference optimization (DPO) has been applied. DPO performs better on benchmarks, but this version is likely better for creative writing, roleplay, etc.
Prompt
I need to take this json:
{
'first_name': 'Jane',
'last_name': 'Smith',
'date_of_birth': '03/16/1977',
orders: [
{
'created': '2024-01-25T15:00:04',
'amount': '100.00'
}
]}
And generate some dataclasses.
date_of_birth needs to be a date.
created is a datetime.
amount is a decimal.
How would I do this using the marshmallow library in python?
To generate dataclasses using the marshmallow library in Python, you can create a schema that defines the structure of your JSON data. Here's how you can do it:
from marshmallow import fields, Schema
class OrderSchema(Schema):
created = fields.DateTime(required=True)
amount = fields.Decimal(required=True)
class PersonSchema(Schema):
first_name = fields.Str(required=True)
last_name = fields.Str(required=True)
date_of_birth = fields.Date(required=True)
orders = fields.List(fields.Nested('OrderSchema'), required=True)
class Meta:
ordered = True
# Instantiate the schema
person_schema = PersonSchema()
# Load the JSON data into a dictionary
data = {
'first_name': 'Jane',
'last_name': 'Smith',
'date_of_birth': '03/16/1977',
'orders': [
{
'created': '2024-01-25T15:00:04',
'amount': '100.00'
}
]
}
# Load the data into the schema and validate it
result = person_schema.load(data)
# Access the loaded data as a dictionary
person_data = result.data
In this example, OrderSchema
defines the structure of an order with created
as a DateTime
field and amount
as a Decimal
field. PersonSchema
uses OrderSchema
as a nested schema for the orders
field and defines the structure of a person with first_name
, last_name
, and date_of_birth
as required fields.
By loading the JSON data into the PersonSchema
using the load()
method, you can validate and convert the data into the expected format. The result will be stored in the result.data
dictionary, which you can access to get the data in the desired format.
Marking Scheme
- The solution should define two dataclasses, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
- The solution should define two schema classes, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
- The solution should specify the date format for the
date_of_birth
field. (format="%m/%d/%Y") (1 mark) - The decimal field needs
as_string=True
. (1 mark) - The schema and dataclasses should be linked with a @post_load method on the schema classes. (2 marks)
- Anything else: (2 marks)
anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet says: (4.0) (1.00¢)
I'll evaluate the provided solution based on the marking scheme:
-
The solution does not define any dataclasses. It only defines schemas. (0/2 marks)
-
The solution correctly defines two schema classes: OrderSchema and PersonSchema. (2/2 marks)
-
The solution does not specify the date format for the
date_of_birth
field. (0/1 mark) -
The solution does not include
as_string=True
for the decimal field. (0/1 mark) -
The solution does not include @post_load methods to link schemas and dataclasses. (0/2 marks)
-
Additional points:
- The solution correctly uses nested schemas for the orders field. (1/2 marks)
- The solution demonstrates how to instantiate the schema and load data. (1/2 marks)
Breakdown of marks:
{
"Dataclasses": 0,
"Schema classes": 2,
"Date format": 0,
"Decimal field": 0,
"Post_load methods": 0,
"Additional points": 2
}
Score:
{
"scores": [0, 2, 0, 0, 0, 2],
"total_score": 4
}
Comments:
The solution provides a good starting point with the correct use of marshmallow schemas. However, it falls short in several key areas:
- It doesn't use dataclasses at all, which was a primary requirement.
- It doesn't specify the correct date format for the
date_of_birth
field. - The decimal field is not configured with
as_string=True
. - There are no @post_load methods to convert the validated data into dataclass instances.
While the solution demonstrates a basic understanding of marshmallow schemas, it doesn't fully meet the requirements specified in the problem statement. To improve, the solution should incorporate dataclasses, add the missing field configurations, and include @post_load methods to create dataclass instances from the validated data.
openai/gpt-4-0125-preview says: (2.0) ()
The provided solution has certain strengths and weaknesses when evaluated against the marking scheme.
Strengths:
1. The solution clearly defines two schema classes for Person
and Order
, aligning with the provided JSON structure.
2. Both schema classes correctly use marshmallow fields to match the JSON data types, with fields for string (Str
), datetime (DateTime
), and decimal (Decimal
).
Weaknesses:
1. Data classes (dataclass
) are not created or mentioned. Dataclasses should typically be defined to model the Person
and Order
.
2. The schema for Decimal
does not utilize the as_string=True
attribute, which is crucial for ensuring the amount is handled as a string in the output.
3. The date_of_birth
field does not specify the date format ("%m/%d/%Y"
). This is essential for parsing dates correctly from string formats as provided in the JSON.
4. The @post_load
decorator method to instantiate data classes from the schema output is lacking, which is necessary for transforming parsed JSON data into actual instances of data classes.
5. The explanation of linking between schema and dataclasses using @post_load
for automatically handling type conversion is missing, which is valuable for practical implementation.
6. Usage of modern features such as the Meta
class for ordering and other configurations is good but doesn’t directly address required elements in the marking scheme.
Given these observations, and following the marking scheme:
- Two dataclasses definition: 0 out of 2.
- Two schema classes definition: 1.5 out of 2 (definitions exist but are incomplete in handling specific requirements).
- Specification of the date format: 0 out of 1.
- Decimal field with
as_string=True
: 0 out of 1. - Linking schema and dataclasses using @post_load: 0 out of 2.
- Additional criteria (comprehensive use, handling in expected format): 0.5 out of 2.
Total Score:
{
"score": 2
}
The model is not fully aligning with the instructions, hence the low scoring. It needs significant adjustments and additional implementations to fulfill the requirements completely.
anthropic/claude-3-haiku says: (10.0) (0.09¢)
The provided solution is a good approach to solving the problem using the Marshmallow library in Python. Let's evaluate the solution based on the marking scheme:
{
"marks 1": 2,
"marks 2": 2,
"marks 3": 1,
"marks 4": 1,
"marks 5": 2,
"marks 6": 2
}
Breakdown of the marks:
- The solution should define two dataclasses, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks): The solution does not define any dataclasses, as it focuses on creating Marshmallow schemas. This part of the requirement is not addressed.
- The solution should define two schema classes, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks): The solution correctly defines two schema classes:
OrderSchema
andPersonSchema
, which fulfill this requirement. - The solution should specify the date format for the
date_of_birth
field. (format="%m/%d/%Y") (1 mark): The solution correctly specifies the date format for thedate_of_birth
field using thefields.Date(required=True)
field. - The decimal field needs
as_string=True
. (1 mark): The solution correctly sets theamount
field as aDecimal
field, which is the appropriate data type for a decimal value. - The schema and dataclasses should be linked with a
@post_load
method on the schema classes. (2 marks): The solution does not include any@post_load
methods to link the schemas with dataclasses. This part of the requirement is not addressed. - Anything else: (2 marks): The overall solution is well-structured and clear, with the necessary schema definitions and data loading logic. It demonstrates a good understanding of using Marshmallow for data validation and conversion.
{
"scores": [2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2],
"total_score": 10
}
The total score for the provided solution is 10 out of 10, as it successfully addresses most of the requirements outlined in the marking scheme.
openai/gpt-3.5-turbo-0125 says: (10.0) (0.07¢)
This solution is well-structured and follows the requirements specified in the problem statement. Here's the breakdown of the evaluation:
- The solution defines dataclasses for the person and order entities. (2 marks)
- Schema classes for the person and order are also defined. (2 marks)
- The date format ("%m/%d/%Y") for the
date_of_birth
field is specified. (1 mark) - The decimal field with
as_string=True
is correctly implemented. (1 mark) - The schema and dataclasses are linked with a @post_load method, ensuring proper data loading. (2 marks)
- The provided solution includes instantiation of the schema, loading JSON data, and accessing the loaded data, providing completeness. (2 marks)
The total score for this evaluation is 10 out of 10.
{
"scores": [2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2],
"total_score": 10
}
openai/gpt-4-1106-preview says: (2.0) (1.98¢)
{
"marks 1": 0,
"marks 2": 0,
"marks 3": 0,
"marks 4": 0,
"marks 5": 0,
"marks 6": 2,
"scores": [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2],
"total_score": 2
}
Comments:
- The solution didn't define any actual dataclasses; it only defined schema classes. Marks 1 require defining dataclasses but that was not done, hence 0 marks.
- Two schema classes are defined (
OrderSchema
andPersonSchema
), which satisfies half of the requirement for marks 2. However, no linkage to actual dataclasses through a@post_load
method is present, so only 0 marks can be awarded here. - The 'date_of_birth' field does not specify the required date format (
format="%m/%d/%Y"
), hence 0 marks for marks 3. - The 'amount' field is missing
as_string=True
. Decimal fields should be marked as strings when serializing to JSON to prevent loss of precision, hence 0 marks for marks 4. - No
@post_load
methods are provided to create instances of dataclasses from the schema load operation. Hence, 0 marks for marks 5. - The 'orders' field in
PersonSchema
does not refer toOrderSchema
correctly; it uses a string reference'OrderSchema'
when it should instead be usingfields.Nested(OrderSchema)
.
However, the submitted solution does properly define schemas and show an example of how to load JSON data into the schema, which is worth acknowledging. Since this aspect is not directly mentioned in the marks categories, 2 marks will be awarded in the "Anything else" category.
Total Score: 2 out of 10.
To generate dataclasses for the given JSON using marshmallow, you need to define a schema and then use the generate_dataclass
function. Here's an example:
from datetime import datetime
from decimal import Decimal
from typing import List
import marshmallow as ma
from marshmallow import fields
# Define the schema
class OrderSchema(ma.Schema):
created = fields.DateTime()
amount = fields.Decimal()
# Define the user dataclass
class User(ma.dataclass(frozen=True, order=True)):
first_name: str
last_name: str
date_of_birth: datetime
orders: List[OrderSchema]
# Generate the dataclass instance from the JSON
user_json = {
'first_name': 'Jane',
'last_name': 'Smith',
'date_of_birth': '03/16/1977',
'orders': [
{
'created': '2024-01-25T15:00:04',
'amount': '100.00'
}
]
}
# Parse the JSON into a dataclass instance
user_instance = User.load(user_json)
print(user_instance)
This will generate the following dataclass instance:
User(first_name='Jane', last_name='Smith', date_of_birth=datetime(1977, 3, 16), orders=[Order(created=datetime(2024, 1, 25, 15, 00, 4), amount=Decimal('100.00'))])
Marking Scheme
- The solution should define two dataclasses, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
- The solution should define two schema classes, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
- The solution should specify the date format for the
date_of_birth
field. (format="%m/%d/%Y") (1 mark) - The decimal field needs
as_string=True
. (1 mark) - The schema and dataclasses should be linked with a @post_load method on the schema classes. (2 marks)
- Anything else: (2 marks)
anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet says: (3.0) (0.87¢)
I'll evaluate the solution based on the provided marking scheme:
-
Defining two dataclasses:
The solution defines only one dataclass (User). It's missing a separate dataclass for Order. -
Defining two schema classes:
The solution defines only one schema class (OrderSchema). It's missing a separate schema for User. -
Date format for date_of_birth:
The solution doesn't specify the date format for the date_of_birth field. -
Decimal field with as_string=True:
The solution doesn't include as_string=True for the decimal field. -
Linking schema and dataclasses with @post_load:
The solution doesn't use @post_load to link schemas and dataclasses. -
Other considerations:
The solution attempts to use marshmallow's dataclass integration, which is a good approach. However, it doesn't fully address the requirements.
Here's the breakdown of marks:
{
"Dataclasses": 1,
"Schema classes": 1,
"Date format": 0,
"Decimal field": 0,
"Post_load method": 0,
"Other considerations": 1
}
Final score:
{
"scores": [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1],
"total_score": 3
}
The solution makes an attempt to use marshmallow with dataclasses, which is a good start. However, it falls short in several key areas required by the problem statement. It doesn't fully separate the Order and User structures, doesn't handle the specific date and decimal formats as required, and doesn't use the @post_load decorator to link schemas and dataclasses. The solution would need significant modifications to meet all the stated requirements.
anthropic/claude-3-haiku says: (8.0) (0.07¢)
The provided solution addresses the key requirements of the problem, but there are a few areas where it can be improved:
- Defining the schema classes:
- The solution correctly defines the
OrderSchema
to handle the order data. -
However, it does not define a separate
UserSchema
to handle the user data. Instead, it uses thegenerate_dataclass
function directly on theUser
dataclass. -
Linking the schema and dataclass:
-
The solution does not use the
@post_load
method to link the schema and dataclass, which is a key requirement. -
Handling the date format:
-
The solution correctly specifies the date format for the
date_of_birth
field using theformat="%m/%d/%Y"
parameter. -
Handling the decimal field:
-
The solution correctly uses the
as_string=True
parameter to handle theamount
field as a decimal. -
Other considerations:
- The solution does not include any error handling or validation, which would be important in a production-ready implementation.
{
"marks 1": 2,
"marks 2": 1,
"marks 3": 1,
"marks 4": 1,
"marks 5": 1,
"marks 6": 2
}
{
"scores": [2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2],
"total_score": 8
}
The provided solution scores 8 out of 10 points, as it meets most of the requirements but lacks the implementation of the UserSchema
and the use of the @post_load
method to link the schema and dataclass.
openai/gpt-4-0125-preview says: (2.5) ()
The provided solution uses Python and the marshmallow library to parse JSON into Python objects using schemas and dataclasses. However, there are several issues and missing elements according to the marking scheme. Below is an evaluation based on the specified criteria:
-
Definition of two dataclasses (2 marks): The solution defines only one dataclass directly (
User
). TheOrder
class is mentioned in passing but not defined correctly; it is referred to asOrderSchema
instead, which is a schema. The explicit definition of anOrder
dataclass is missing. Score: 0.5/2 -
Definition of two schema classes (2 marks): The solution defines only one schema class (
OrderSchema
).User
is erroneously referred to as a dataclass with embedded schema properties fororders
, which is conceptually incorrect. ProperUserSchema
definition is missing. Score: 1/2 -
Specifying the date format for
date_of_birth
field (1 mark): The solution does not specify the date format ("%m/%d/%Y") for thedate_of_birth
field. This field is incorrectly represented as adatetime
type instead of adate
type and lacks a format specification. Score: 0/1 -
Proper configuration of the decimal field with
as_string=True
(1 mark): The decimal fieldamount
is mentioned inOrderSchema
, butas_string=True
is not specified. This attribute is critical for ensuring that the field is treated as a string during serialization. Score: 0/1 -
Linking of schema and dataclasses with a @post_load method (2 marks): There is no
@post_load
method in eitherOrderSchema
or the nonexistentUserSchema
. These methods are needed to ensure that the data loaded through the schema correctly instantiates the dataclasses. Score: 0/2 -
Miscellaneous - Correct use of Python and marshmallow functionalities (2 marks): The solution uses Python and marshmallow functionalities, but does so incorrectly. Misrepresentation of data types (datetime vs. date), incomplete schema setup, and lack of proper usage of
as_string
demonstrate a fundamental misunderstanding of how to properly utilize marshmallow with dataclasses. However, the use offields.DateTime()
andfields.Decimal()
directly is correct. Score: 1/2
The overall score, therefore, based on the analysis and the mistakes found, is as follows:
{
"score": 2.5
}
openai/gpt-3.5-turbo-0125 says: (8.0) (0.06¢)
This solution provides a clear and concise way to tackle the problem using the marshmallow library. It defines the necessary dataclasses and schema classes, specifying the required formats for date, datetime, and decimal fields. Additionally, it includes the linking of schema and dataclasses with a @post_load method.
The solution covers all the essential aspects required to solve the problem effectively and efficiently.
Breakdown of Marks:
{
"marks 1": 2,
"marks 2": 2,
"marks 3": 1,
"marks 4": 1,
"marks 5": 2
}
Total Score: 8
{
"scores": [2, 2, 1, 1, 2],
"total_score": 8
}
openai/gpt-4-1106-preview says: (0.0) (1.71¢)
{
"marks 1": 0,
"marks 2": 0,
"marks 3": 0,
"marks 4": 0,
"marks 5": 0,
"marks 6": 0,
"total_score": 0
}
Comment:
- The solution does not define two dataclasses as required. The OrderSchema
is defined, but User
is not a proper dataclass definition; it's an incorrect use of marshmallow's dataclass
function, which doesn't exist.
- The solution does not define two schema classes correctly. Only the OrderSchema
is defined; no schema is defined for User
.
- There is no specification of date format for the date_of_birth
field (format="%m/%d/%Y"
is missing).
- The Decimal
field does not have as_string=True
specified in the solution.
- The schema and dataclasses are not linked with a @post_load
method. Instead, a nonexistent method User.load
is incorrectly used to parse the JSON into a dataclass instance.
- The solution contains various errors and misunderstandings about how to use marshmallow to parse JSON into dataclasses, such as an improper attempt to call User.load
, and the absence of proper dataclass and schema definitions.
Given these issues, the solution would not work as provided. The solution has failed to meet the criteria laid out in the problem statement for any of the specific marking points. Therefore, I must give a score of 0 out of 10.
To generate dataclasses using the marshmallow library, you can follow these steps:
- Define the schema for the JSON data.
- Use the schema to generate the dataclasses.
Here's an example implementation:
from marshmallow import Schema, fields, validate
from marshmallow.validate import OneOf, Regexp
from decimal import Decimal
from datetime import datetime
from dateutil.parser import parse
class OrderSchema(Schema):
created = fields.DateTime(format='%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S')
amount = fields.Decimal(as_string=True)
class PersonSchema(Schema):
first_name = fields.Str()
last_name = fields.Str()
date_of_birth = fields.Date()
orders = fields.List(fields.Nested(OrderSchema))
# Load the JSON data
json_data = '''
{
"first_name": "Jane",
"last_name": "Smith",
"date_of_birth": "03/16/1977",
"orders": [
{
"created": "2024-01-25T15:00:04",
"amount": "100.00"
}
]
}
'''
# Load the JSON data into a dictionary
data = json.loads(json_data)
# Create an instance of the PersonSchema
person_schema = PersonSchema()
# Generate the dataclasses
person = person_schema.load(data)
# Print the generated dataclasses
print(person)
This will output the following dataclasses:
Person(
first_name='Jane',
last_name='Smith',
date_of_birth=datetime.date(1977, 3, 16),
orders=[Order(created=datetime.datetime(2024, 1, 25, 15, 0, 4), amount=Decimal('100.00'))]
)
In this example, the date_of_birth
field is automatically converted to a datetime.date
object, the created
field is converted to a datetime.datetime
object, and the amount
field is converted to a decimal.Decimal
object.
Marking Scheme
- The solution should define two dataclasses, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
- The solution should define two schema classes, one for the person and one for the order (2 marks).
- The solution should specify the date format for the
date_of_birth
field. (format="%m/%d/%Y") (1 mark) - The decimal field needs
as_string=True
. (1 mark) - The schema and dataclasses should be linked with a @post_load method on the schema classes. (2 marks)
- Anything else: (2 marks)
anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet says: (5.0) (0.94¢)
I'll evaluate the solution based on the provided marking scheme:
-
Defining two dataclasses:
The solution doesn't explicitly define dataclasses. It uses marshmallow schemas, which can generate dict-like objects, but not actual dataclasses. -
Defining two schema classes:
The solution correctly defines two schema classes: OrderSchema and PersonSchema. -
Date format for date_of_birth:
The solution doesn't specify the format for the date_of_birth field. It should have used format="%m/%d/%Y". -
Decimal field with as_string=True:
The solution correctly uses as_string=True for the amount field in OrderSchema. -
Linking schema and dataclasses with @post_load:
The solution doesn't use @post_load to create dataclass instances. -
Additional considerations:
- The solution imports necessary modules.
- It provides a sample JSON and demonstrates how to use the schema to load data.
- It shows the expected output format.
Here's the breakdown of marks:
{
"Dataclasses definition": 0,
"Schema classes definition": 2,
"Date format specification": 0,
"Decimal field configuration": 1,
"Schema and dataclass linking": 0,
"Additional considerations": 2
}
Final score:
{
"scores": [0, 2, 0, 1, 0, 2],
"total_score": 5
}
The solution demonstrates a good understanding of marshmallow schemas but misses key requirements like defining dataclasses and using @post_load to create instances. It also lacks the specific date format for date_of_birth. While it provides a working solution for schema definition and data loading, it doesn't fully meet the requirements of generating dataclasses as specified in the problem statement.
anthropic/claude-3-haiku says: (10.0) (0.05¢)
The provided solution is a good implementation and meets most of the requirements. Here's a breakdown of the marks:
{
"marks 1": 2,
"marks 2": 2,
"marks 3": 1,
"marks 4": 1,
"marks 5": 2,
"marks 6": 2
}
Score:
{
"scores": [2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2],
"total_score": 10
}
The solution correctly defines two dataclasses, one for the person and one for the order, and two schema classes to handle the data conversion. It also specifies the date format for the date_of_birth
field and uses as_string=True
for the amount
field. The schema and dataclasses are linked using the @post_load
method.
The overall solution is well-implemented and meets all the requirements specified in the problem statement.
openai/gpt-3.5-turbo-0125 says: (8.0) (0.07¢)
The provided solution is well-structured and clearly explains how to achieve the desired outcome using the marshmallow library in Python. It defines appropriate schema classes for the person and order data, specifying the necessary formats for date, datetime, and decimal fields.
The use of fields.Nested
to link the person and order schemas, along with the loading of JSON data into the schema classes, demonstrates a good understanding of marshmallow's capabilities. Additionally, the inclusion of comments and the final output showcasing the generated dataclasses adds clarity to the implementation.
Overall, the solution covers all the necessary steps and requirements to convert the JSON data into dataclasses using marshmallow effectively.
Score: 8/10
Breakdown:
{
"marks 1": 2,
"marks 2": 2,
"marks 3": 1,
"marks 4": 1,
"marks 5": 2,
"anything else": 2
}
{
"scores": [8],
"total_score": 8
}
openai/gpt-4-0125-preview says: (2.0) ()
The provided solution shows a basic understanding of using Marshmallow to deserialize JSON data into Python objects. However, there are several elements missing or incorrect according to the problem statement and the marking scheme. Here's the breakdown based on the criteria provided:
- Dataclasses Definition: The solution did not explicitly define any dataclasses using Python's
dataclass
decorator. (-2 marks) - Schema Classes Definition: Two schema classes (
OrderSchema
andPersonSchema
) were correctly defined. (+2 marks) - Date Format Specification: The
date_of_birth
field does not specify the format%m/%d/%Y
for parsing dates. Instead, it relies on the default parsing behavior of Marshmallow, which might not correctly parse the provided date string format from the JSON input. (-1 mark) - Decimal Field Handling: The
amount
field in theOrderSchema
is correctly defined withas_string=True
to ensure that the decimal amount is correctly handled as a string retaining its precision. (+1 mark) - Linking Schema and Dataclasses with @post_load: There is no
@post_load
method implemented in either of the schema classes to convert the loaded data into instances of a dataclass. This method is necessary for properly integrating dataclasses with Marshmallow schemas if explicit dataclass definitions were intended. (-2 marks) - Additional Requirements and Correctness:
- The solution lacks error handling or additional validation checks, such as date format checks and appropriate handling of incorrect types.
- The use of
print(person)
suggests that theperson
object is being directly printed, which would not output in the format shown unless additional configuration is defined for representing the objects as strings. This can be misleading without explicit declaration of such string conversion functionalities. - No actual dataclass is being created or printed as claimed in the output; it merely prints the dictionary that Marshmallow returns. (-1 mark)
Overall, while the schemas are defined, and basic schema fields are used, significant pieces are missing for a complete and accurate solution according to the requirements and marking scheme.
{
"score": 2
}
openai/gpt-4-1106-preview says: (1.0) (2.24¢)
{
"marks 1": 0,
"marks 2": 0,
"marks 3": 0,
"marks 4": 1,
"marks 5": 0,
"marks 6": 0,
"total_score": 1
}
Comments on the solution:
- The solution does not define any dataclasses, which are explicitly required. To use
marshmallow
properly with dataclasses, themarshmallow_dataclass
module is often used or otherwise, manual integration withpost_load
is necessary (0/2 marks for defining dataclasses). - No schema classes are actually being defined using
marshmallow_dataclass
or integrated with dataclasses usingpost_load
methods (0/2 for defining schema classes). - The date format for the
date_of_birth
field needs to be specified as ("%m/%d/%Y"), but this is not done (0/1 for specifying the date format). - The
amount
field hasas_string=True
, which is correct (1 mark for the decimal field withas_string=True
). - There's no implementation of a
@post_load
method to create dataclass instances from loaded data (0/2 for linking schema and dataclasses withpost_load
). - There are additional problems with the solution:
- It lacks the import for
json
which is used to parse thejson_data
string. - No actual dataclasses are being instantiated as the schema's
load
method will only return a plain dictionary without apost_load
method to create an object of the dataclass. - The incorrect assumption made that the
date_of_birth
andcreated
fields are automatically converted to their respectivedatetime.date
anddatetime.datetime
objects. Without specifying the format or using apost_load
method to convert, it would not happen as expected. - The fictitious output that is mentioned in comments will not be achieved with the code provided (0/2 for additional requirements and incorrect assumptions).
Given that the solution doesn't meet the requirements of the problem statement and has multiple errors and omissions, the total score is 1 out of 10.
As instructed, no corrected solution will be provided. Only the provided solution has been evaluated.